SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THIS PETITION
(AIMING FOR SUBMISSION TO PRINTER ON APRIL 18, 2011)
This
is the Reply Brief regarding the Petition for Certiorari (to the Supreme Court) in the lawsuit challenging the
infusion of Monotheism into the Presidential inaugurations.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that there was no "redressability."
A Petition for Rehearing was denied, so now we're at the last step ... asking the Supreme Court to hear the matter. The odds are very slim - about 1% by sheer numbers - that they will take the case. This, however, is the
way to ask them to do so.
The entire document is very short - less than 3,000 words. Thus, you should be able to review it all in less than 30 minutes.
[If you wish to read the Brief in Opposition (filed by the Solicitor General's Office), it is attached at the end of the Brief.] Your efforts to correct any errors and improve any prose will, as always, be greatly appreciated.
Please
review this Brief and let us know what you come up with.
Please
be aware that I will be making changes to the brief as I receive comments, so please
do your download just before you start reading. Otherwise, you will be wasting
your time (and mine), as you find, comment upon and send notes to me about
errors that were already corrected. Moreover, there is always the chance that
I will have screwed things up with the last correction, so having you review the
latest version is really critical to making sure nothing is overlooked.
I
think the best way for you to review the brief is to have a file or email page
open while you read, and then simply mark down your corrections, comments,
etc., as you see them. If you can, please note the page number and give a
description of the sentence you’re referencing, so that I know exactly where
to look. (Even if you download the latest version, there still may have been
significant changes to the document before you send me your findings.)
Please
use the following email address: PledgeHelp@gmail.com
to send me your comments.
Thanks,
again!
-
Mike