Newdow v. Eagen

Note: Some of the following documents are just the raw, unformatted, output from our OCR software and other are not even scanned at this time. We apologize if this is an incontinence, but we are in the process of scanning and formatting many documents and it will take a few months to complete. Please come back again to see readable versions of these documents.

*U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia*
08-27-2002	Rev. Dr. Michael Newdow (Plaintiff) files Original Complaint against Congress and its officers, responsible for paying the salaries of the congressional chaplains. The complaint alleges that congressional chaplains violate the Establishment Clause.
11-21-2002	The Congressional Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (needs work #2) filed.
11-22-2002	The United States’ Motion to Dismiss (needs work #3) filed.
12-13-2002	Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motions to Dismiss (needs work #4) filed.
01-16-2003	Reply Memorandum of Senate Defendants filed.
01-16-2003	Reply Memorandum of United States filed.
03-24-2004	District Court Judge Kennedy issues Grant of Motions to Dismiss.
05-12-2003	Plaintiff files Amended Complaint (needs work #5).
05-16-2003	The United States’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed.
*U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia*